Traditional broadcast news sources were by far the most common sources. In contrast, social media sources like Facebook and Twitter were the least commonly identified sources for news on this issue. There are limits to what this snapshot can tell us about how social media use is related to the ways Americans discuss important political issues.sivamont.hu/la-historia-de-mi-amigo.php
Project Silence | Discography & Songs | Discogs
This study focuses on one specific public affairs issue that was of interest to most Americans: the Snowden-NSA revelations. It is not an exhaustive review of all public policy issues and the way they are discussed in social media. The context of the Snowden-NSA story may also have made it somewhat different from other kinds of public debates. For a phone call, the meta-data collected by the NSA was described as including the duration of the call, when it happened, the numbers the call was between, but not a recording of the call.
Additional information leaked by Snowden after our study was completed suggests that Western intelligence agencies monitored and manipulated the content of online discussions and the NSA recorded the content of foreign phone calls. In reaction to these additional revelations, people may have adjusted their use of social media and their willingness to discuss a range of topics, including public issues such as government surveillance.
PROJECT SILENCE // FIN
However, given the limited extent of the information leaked by Snowden at the time the survey was fielded, it seems unlikely that the average American had extensively altered their willingness to discuss political issues. Future research may provide insight into whether Americans have become more or less willing to discuss specific issues on-and offline as a result of government surveillance programs. While this study focused on the Snowden-NSA revelations, we suspect that Americans use social media in similar ways to discuss and get news about other political issues.
The rise of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, has introduced new spaces where political discussion and debate can take place.
- Rikiki (Histoires pour attendre) (French Edition).
- Driving Tour of One-Room Schools in the Ozarks.
- Project Silence | Capital of Metal?
- Summary: Planet India: Review and Analysis of Mira Kamdars Book?
- Project Silence.
- HIAP | Silence Project.
This report explores the degree to which social media affects a long-established human attribute—that those who think they hold minority opinions often self-censor, failing to speak out for fear of ostracism or ridicule. This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals: 5 Keith N.
Other major reports from the Pew Research Center Internet Project on the social and political impact of social networking sites on social and political activity can be found at:. The margin of error for the full sample is plus or minus 2. Some 1, respondents are users of social networking sites and the margin of error for that subgroup is plus or minus 3. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you. About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world.
It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions.
It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Home U. Main More. Summary of Findings A major insight into human behavior from pre-internet era studies of communication is the tendency of people not to speak up about policy issues in public—or among their family, friends, and work colleagues—when they believe their own point of view is not widely shared. Social media did not provide an alternative discussion platform for those who were not willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story. In both personal settings and online settings, people were more willing to share their views if they thought their audience agreed with them.
Fototeca de Cuba
For instance, at work, those who felt their coworkers agreed with their opinion were about three times more likely to say they would join a workplace conversation about the Snowden-NSA situation. Those who use Facebook were more willing to share their views if they thought their followers agreed with them. If a person felt that people in their Facebook network agreed with their opinion about the Snowden-NSA issue, they were about twice as likely to join a discussion on Facebook about this issue.
Please provide more details about your request. Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free and requires only your email address.
Bringing neighbours closer
Email required. Password required Remember me? Please enter your email address and click on the reset-password button.
If your email exists in our system, we'll send you an email with a link to reset your password. Please note that the link will expire twenty-four hours after the email is sent. If you can't find this email, please check your spam folder.
Reset Password Cancel. Get our weekly newsletters. By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions. Cookies and Privacy. Oct 28, Nina L. Show More Contact Us. Your name Your email Friend's name Friend's email Message. Cancel Send. Back Scholarship Internship. Back Past Recipients Apply. Our Mission in Action 1. BEYOND We are developing initiatives to expand to other local communities, spread the word about mental health in the military, and find ways to connect our organization with the greater DSM area.